Home > Search Results: keywords:"workplace injury regulation in Poland"
Search:
Search Tips :: Advanced Search
Search collections:
Sort by: Display results: Output format:
National Repository of Grey Literature 2 records found  Search took 0.01 seconds. 
Workplace Injury
 Sembol, Jakub ; Drápal, Ljubomír (advisor) ; Bělina, Miroslav (referee)
66 Summary The topic of my work is workplace injury. The goal of this work is comparison of two main approaches to this topic that have been discussed over the past years, namely - the employer`s responsibility versus accidental insurance of employees. The first one mentioned is effective in Czech republic and the second was meant to be effective from 1st January 2008 but it was postponed three times (last time to 1st January 2015) and it is now considered to be canceled. The goal is to understand why and to determine which of the systems better suits the purposes of a workplace injury regulation in Czech Republic. At the beginning I start with a brief historical background (from the year 1989) of the regulation for better understanding of the need for new legislation. Next I am going to achieve the goal of this work by describing the first system by detailed analysis of the effective regulation - explaining terms such as liability, workplace injury, exemptions from liability, types of compensation and also present few a court decisions on the matter. Then I am going to describe the second system by explaining the differences that the accidental insurance of employees act (266/2006 Coll.) would bring if it ever becomes effective. For a more detailed description I would also present the regulation of a...
Detailed record
Workplace Injury
 Sembol, Jakub ; Drápal, Ljubomír (advisor) ; Bělina, Miroslav (referee)
66 Summary The topic of my work is workplace injury. The goal of this work is comparison of two main approaches to this topic that have been discussed over the past years, namely - the employer`s responsibility versus accidental insurance of employees. The first one mentioned is effective in Czech republic and the second was meant to be effective from 1st January 2008 but it was postponed three times (last time to 1st January 2015) and it is now considered to be canceled. The goal is to understand why and to determine which of the systems better suits the purposes of a workplace injury regulation in Czech Republic. At the beginning I start with a brief historical background (from the year 1989) of the regulation for better understanding of the need for new legislation. Next I am going to achieve the goal of this work by describing the first system by detailed analysis of the effective regulation - explaining terms such as liability, workplace injury, exemptions from liability, types of compensation and also present few a court decisions on the matter. Then I am going to describe the second system by explaining the differences that the accidental insurance of employees act (266/2006 Coll.) would bring if it ever becomes effective. For a more detailed description I would also present the regulation of a...
Detailed record

Interested in being notified about new results for this query?
Subscribe to the RSS feed.
Digital Repository :: Search :: Submit :: Personalize :: Help
Powered by Invenio v1.1.2
Maintained by admin.invenio@techlib.cz
This site is also available in the following languages:
Česky  English